Bankruptcy
Laws: Page 6
Page 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8
The changes made by S. 256 are generally
effective only with respect to cases filed after its effective date –
180 days after the date of enactment (October 17, 2005). However, as noted
above, the limitations on homestead exemptions set out in § 308, 322, and
330 are effective upon enactment, while the auditing requirements of §
603 are not effective until 18 months after enactment. Some of the
retroactive elements of the homestead exemptions are already in litigation
and many bankruptcy attorneys indicate that it will take 3-5 years for the
courts to set forth more defined guidelines interpreting the various
aspects of the new law.
Consumer cases under Chapter 7
12b.
New § 707(b) — income means testing.
Section 707(b) of the Bankruptcy Code was
amended to provide for dismissal of Chapter 7 cases or (with the
debtor’s consent) conversion to chapter 13, upon a finding of abuse by
an individual debtor with primarily consumer debts. Abuse can be found in
one of two ways: first, through an unrebutted presumption of abuse,
arising under a new means test (§ 707(b) (2)); and second, on general
grounds, including bad faith, determined under the totality of the
circumstances (§ 707(b) (3)).
Standing. New § 707(b)(1)
generally allows any party in interest, as well as the court on its own
initiative, to bring a motion seeking dismissal of a Chapter7 for abuse,
but § 707 (b)(6) provides that only the judge, U.S. trustee or bankruptcy
administrator may bring the motion if the debtor’s income does not
exceed a defined state median. This means that mortgage creditors who
already possess substantial income information on various debtors may be
able to contest Chapter 7, cases based on this abuse standard. Moreover,
under § 707 (b(7) the means-test presumption is completely inapplicable
to debtors whose income is below that median. Standing limitations can be
summarized in a table:
| |
Debtor’s income at/below the
applicable median |
Debtor’s income above the
applicable median |
| The means-test |
No standing |
|
General grounds
of abuse |
Only judges, U.S. trustees, and
bankruptcy administrators have
standing |
All parties in interest have standing |
To apply the standing limitations, it is
necessary to determine both “debtor’s income” and the applicable
state median.
a) Debtor’s
income. Generally, the debtor’s income, for purposes of standing to
bring an abuse motion, is defined as the debtor’s “current monthly
income” multiplied by 12.
b) Applicable median income. The median income
applicable for determining standing to bring a motion under § 707(b) is as
follows: (a) for a debtor in a household of 1 person, the median family income
of the applicable state for one earner; (b) for a debtor in a household of two,
three or four individuals, the highest median family income of the applicable
state for a family of the same or fewer persons; and (c) for a debtor in a
household of more than four individuals, the highest median family income of the
applicable state for a family of four or fewer individuals, plus $525 per month
for each individual in excess of four. Median income tables vary with location
and they can be found at: www.census.gov/hhes/income/4person.html.
Finding applicable median incomes may require some effort, because the
information (at least at the present time) is accessible on the Census Web
site only through a custom search. However, it can be expected that the
Executive Office for United States Trustees will publish median income
tables.
The Census does not compile income figures by household size and state
every year. Needless to say, there are myriad statistical issues that may
be presented as to how these statistics should be adjusted. The currently
available income by state and family size was reported in the 2000 census,
reflecting data from 1999. These figures would therefore be increased by
consumer price index adjustments beginning in 2001 (as long as the census
figures were both “calculated and reported” in 2000).
Presumption of abuse under the means-test. The presumption of
abuse, set out in a new § 707(b)(2), is governed by a means test, which
is designed to determine the extent of a debtor’s ability to repay
general unsecured claims. The means-test has three elements: (a) a
definition of “current monthly income,” which measures the total
income a debtor is presumed to have available; (b) a list of allowed
deductions from current monthly income, for purposes of support and
repayment of higher priority debt; and (c) defined “trigger points,”
at which the income remaining after allowed deductions would result in the
presumption of abuse.
a) Presumed
income. “Current monthly income” is defined as a new § 101(10A)
as a monthly average of all the income received by the debtor (and the
debtor’s spouse in a joint case) — including regular contributions to
household expenses made by other persons, excluding Social Security
benefits and certain victim payments — during a defined six-month
period. If a debtor files schedules with the bankruptcy petition, the
six-month period ends with the last day of the calendar month before the
filing.
b) Presumed deductions.The deductions from current monthly
allowed under the means-test are set out in the new § 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)-(iv)
and can be categorized as follows:
(1) Living expenses specified under standards of the Internal Revenue
Service.
The IRS has developed living expense standards to provide guidance for its
agents in negotiating consensual payment of overdue taxes. The IRS’s Web
site, www.irs.gov/individuals/article/0,,id=96543,00.html,
explains the standards and links to tables of allowed expenses.
The specified expense allowances are two types. First, “National
Standards” establish allowances for food, clothing, personal care, and
entertainment, depending on the taxpayer’s family size, on a national
basis (except for Alaska and Hawaii, which have higher allowances). Under
the means-test, debtors can deduct the National Standards amounts with an
increase of up to 5 percent of the food and clothing allowance, if
demonstrated to be reasonable and necessary.
Second, the IRS’s “Local Standards” establish allowances for
transportation (on regional basis) and housing (on a country by country
basis). It can be expected that the Executive Office for the United States
Trustees will issue tables of the IRS standards applicable on each
relevant geographical area.
In any event, the means-test requires that the amounts deducted by the
debtor under the national and local standards be reduced by whatever
portion of the allowance reflects payment of debt. Thus, repayment of a
car loan would be deducted from the IRS Local Standards allowance for
acquiring transportation.
|