Bankruptcy
Laws: Page 8
Page 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
Section 330 (a)(3) is amended to exclude
Chapter 7 trustees from the professionals whose compensation is to be
based, among other things, on the time spent providing their services.
Rather, a new § 330(a)(7) is added, providing that the reasonable
compensation of “a trustee” shall be treated “as a commission, based
on §326.” Although new paragraph (a)(7) is not limited by its terms to
Chapter 7 trustees, Chapter 11 trustees are expressly included in the list
of professional subject to & 330 (a)(3), and so it is doubtful the new
paragraph applies to Chapter 11 trustees.
Section 1326 is amended to add a new paragraph (b)(3), providing for
payment of compensation awarded to a Chapter 7 trustee in connection with
the conversion or dismissal of a debtor’s case pursuant to § 707(b).
Any such compensation remaining unpaid during the Chapter 13 case is to be
paid over the remaining term of the Chapter 13 plan, according to a
limiting formula: no more that $25 per month or 5 percent of the average
monthly payment made to general unsecured creditors under the plan,
whichever is greater. Since most chapter 13 plan do not provide more than
$500 per month in payments to general unsecured creditors, it is likely
that trustees would be paid no more than $25 per month under this formula
– a maximum of $1,500 over a five-year plan.
Section 724(b) is amended to limit the
authorization of a Chapter 7 trustee to pay priority claims from funds
that would otherwise be used to satisfy a property tax lien (and
subordinate the tax lien to other liens on the affected property). Except
for wage and employee benefit priority claims, this subordination is made
inapplicable to perfected ad valorem property taxes, the situation in
which it most commonly arises. Moreover, even for wage and benefit
priorities, and even as to liens arising from property tax assessed other
than on the value of the property, subordination would be allowed under
new § 724(e) only after the trustee had exhausted the unencumbered assets
of the estate – including § 506(c) recoveries from holders of secured
claims. Thus, in contrast to the prior law, if a debtor owes both ad
valorem property taxes secured by a lien on the debtor’s property and
support obligations, the proceeds property taxes secured by a lien on the
debtor’s property and support obligations, the proceeds of any sale of
the property will now be used to pay the taxes before the support
obligations.
Changes to consumer cases under Chapter 13
Elimination of “cram down” for certain
secured loans
Section 1325(a) is amended to limit the power of Chapter 13 plans to cram
down secured claims to the value of the collateral under § 506(a). No
cram down would be allowed for (1) purchase money security interests in
motor vehicles purchased within 910 days of the bankruptcy filing (two
days less than 2-1/2 years) or (2) as to all other secured debts (whether
or not involving purchase money security interests) incurred within one
year of bankruptcy. Under the old law, if a debtor's car was worth $6,000
and the outstanding loan was $10,000, the lender would be assured $6,000
in payment but would have to stand in line with other creditors to try to
recover the $4,000 balance. Under the new law, the borrower in many cases
will be required to repay the entire $10,000 if the vehicle was purchased
within 30 months of the bankruptcy filing.
Valuation of certain secured claims
New § 506(a)(2), discussed above in connection with redemption, applies
in Chapter 13 as well as Chapter 7, and, in Chapter 13, has the effect of
requiring that the crammed down value of a secured claim be based on the
cost to the debtor of replacing the collateral without deduction for costs
of sale or marketing. And, that if the collateral was acquired for
personal, family, or household purposes, this replacement cost is the
retail price for property of similar age and condition.
Payments before and after plan confirmation
S.256 makes two changes requiring adequate protection payments on secured
claims in Chapter 13. First, § 1325(a)(5)(B) is amended by the addition
of a new subparagraph (iii) requiring that Chapter 13 plans provide for
payment of secured claims in equal installments, at least sufficient to
provide adequate protection. Second, § 1326(a)(1) is amended by the
addition of new subparagraphs (B) and (C), which require that, prior to
plan confirmation, and unless otherwise ordered by the court, the debtor
must make adequate protection payments directly to the secured creditor,
deduct the adequate protection payments from the pre-confirmation plan
payments made to the trustee, and give proof of the adequate protection
payments to the trustee. The amount required to be paid for
pre-confirmation adequate protection is not clearly defined, but it
appears that the debtor might have the choice of paying either the amount
called for by the plan or the amount due under the loan. Pre-confirmation
payments on personal property leases (primarily auto leases) would have to
be paid directly to the lessor, with proof of the same provided to the
trustee.
Conclusion: The new bankruptcy law imposes many restrictions that will
make it much more difficult to discharge unsecured debt, which will allow
lenders to enforce and foreclose secured claims such as mortgages over a
shorter timeframe. The amount of non-dischargeable debt will tremendously
increase, affecting the ability of many households to qualify for future
mortgages.
Page 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8
|